Reducing leadership risk in high-stakes decisions.
Independent behavioural assessment for executive appointments, succession, and investment decisions.
We help boards, investors, and leadership teams identify hidden leadership risks before they become costly.
WHO WE ARE
Pacan Zechner is an independent behavioural advisory focused on high-stakes leadership and organisational decisions.
The work is led by André David Pacan, a business psychologist with experience across executive search, leadership assessment, and organisational analysis in complex environments.
He previously built and led a business psychology offering within an executive search firm, integrating behavioural assessment into C-suite hiring and senior advisory work.
This experience informs a focus on evaluating behavioural risk and potential derailers, particularly where apparent strengths may mask longer-term impact.
It is particularly relevant in senior leadership hiring, evaluating risk beyond what is immediately visible, and situations where leadership misalignment or early signs of failure are difficult to evidence.
It provides clear, defensible views where confidence is incomplete and the consequences of misjudgement are significant. Delivered independently, with objective, decision-relevant insight free from internal or commercial bias.

André David Pacan, MSc, CBP, GMBPsS
Business Psychologist & Leadership Risk Advisor
Founder & Director, Pacan Zechner
WHAT WE DO
We support boards, founders, and investors in critical leadership decisions where the cost of error is high.
Pacan Zechner provides independent leadership assessment and behavioural risk advisory in high-stakes contexts.
Our work focuses on:
- Leadership capability and judgement under pressure
- Behavioural risk, including traits that may be misinterpreted as strengths or effectiveness
- Alignment with organisational context and future demands
We combine psychometric insight, behavioural analysis, and contextual evaluation to form a coherent and defensible view of leadership.
Insight is translated into clear, decision-relevant guidance that supports confident and defensible decisions.
This enables a clearer understanding of leadership risk, trade-offs, and likely long-term impact.
WHEN WE ARE ENGAGED
We are engaged at moments where the cost of getting a leadership decision wrong is high.
This typically includes situations where leadership decisions carry significant organisational, cultural, or investment consequence.
- C-suite appointments and succession decisions where capability is clear, but fit, risk, or long-term effectiveness is uncertain
- Leadership teams experiencing friction, misalignment, or uneven performance
- Founder or executive transitions where role requirements are shifting
- Private equity and investor-backed environments where leadership quality will materially influence outcomes
- Pre- and post-acquisition leadership assessment
- Situations where something feels “off” in leadership behaviour but is difficult to evidence or articulate
In these contexts, behavioural risk is often under-recognised, and the cost of misjudgement is greater than it appears.


OUR APPROACH
Our approach is designed to form clear and defensible views of leadership effectiveness and risk in context.
We integrate multiple sources of behavioural evidence to form a coherent and decision-relevant view.
This includes:
- Psychometric assessment and behavioural profiling
- Structured executive interviews
- Leadership risk and derailer analysis
- Organisational and role context review
- Insight is grounded and directly relevant to the decision at hand.
Particular focus is placed on how behaviour presents in context, and how it may impact performance, relationships, and organisational outcomes.
The objective is not more data, but a clear view of leadership effectiveness and risk.
START A CONFIDENTIAL CONVERSATION
If you are facing a critical leadership decision, we provide an independent and objective perspective.
Initial conversations are exploratory, confidential, and focused on understanding whether additional perspective would be valuable.

